Joseph L. Barnett and Nellie Blanche Barnett v. United States
This text of 289 F.2d 939 (Joseph L. Barnett and Nellie Blanche Barnett v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
289 F.2d 939
61-1 USTC P 9482
Joseph L. BARNETT and Nellie Blanche Barnett, Appellants,
v.
UNITED STATES of America, Appellee.
No. 16677.
United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit.
May 25, 1961.
George P. Holt, Honolulu, Hawaii, for appellants.
Charles K. Rice, Asst. U.S. Atty., and Lee A. Jackson, Robert N. Anderson, Frederick E. Youngman, and Douglas A. Kahn, Attys., Dept. of Justice, Washington, D.C., and Louis B. Blissard, U.S. Atty., Honolulu, Hawaii, for appellee.
Before CHAMBERS, HAMLIN and JERTBERG, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
The judgment is affirmed on the opinion of the trial judge as reported, Barnett v. United States, D.C., 174 F.Supp. 907.
The opinion, in our judgment, is correct in all respects.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
289 F.2d 939, 7 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 1573, 1961 U.S. App. LEXIS 4399, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/joseph-l-barnett-and-nellie-blanche-barnett-v-united-states-ca9-1961.