Joseph Jose Vargas v. State

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedDecember 21, 2006
Docket13-06-00557-CR
StatusPublished

This text of Joseph Jose Vargas v. State (Joseph Jose Vargas v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Joseph Jose Vargas v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2006).

Opinion



NUMBER 13-06-557-CR



COURT OF APPEALS



THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS



CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

____________________________________________________________



JOSEPH VARGAS, Appellant,



v.



THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee.



On appeal from the 290th District Court

of Bexar County, Texas.



MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Yañez and Garza

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam



Appellant, JOSEPH VARGAS, attempts to appeal a conviction for possession of cocaine in an amount between 200-400 grams. The trial court has certified that this "is a plea-bargain case, and the defendant has NO right of appeal." See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(a)(2).

On October 9, 2006, this Court notified appellant's counsel of the trial court's certification and ordered counsel to: (1) review the record; (2) determine whether appellant has a right to appeal; and (3) forward to this Court, by letter, counsel's findings as to whether appellant has a right to appeal, or, alternatively, advise this Court as to the existence of any amended certification.

On October 26, 2006, counsel filed a letter brief with this Court. Counsel's response does not establish (1) that the certification currently on file with this Court is incorrect or (2) that appellant otherwise has a right to appeal.

The Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure provide that an appeal must be dismissed if the trial court's certification does not show that the defendant has the right of appeal. Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(d); see Tex. R. App. P. 37.1, 44.3, 44.4. Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed. Any pending motions are denied as moot.



PER CURIAM



Do not publish. Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).



Memorandum Opinion delivered and filed this

the 21st day of December, 2006.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Joseph Jose Vargas v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/joseph-jose-vargas-v-state-texapp-2006.