Joseph Johnson v. Michael J. Astrue

414 F. App'x 887
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
DecidedMarch 28, 2011
Docket10-3741
StatusUnpublished

This text of 414 F. App'x 887 (Joseph Johnson v. Michael J. Astrue) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Joseph Johnson v. Michael J. Astrue, 414 F. App'x 887 (8th Cir. 2011).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Joseph Johnson appeals the district court’s 1 dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) action for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Having carefully reviewed the record and considered Johnson’s arguments for reversal, we agree with the district court’s reasons for concluding that subject matter jurisdiction was lacking. See In Home Health, Inc. v. Shalala, 272 F.3d 554, 559 (8th Cir.2001) (de novo review). We Accordingly, the judgment is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. We also deny the pending motion for sanctions.

1

. The Honorable Charles A. Shaw, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Missouri, adopting the report and recommendations of the Honorable Frederick R. Buckles, United States Magistrate Judge for the Eastern District of Missouri.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
414 F. App'x 887, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/joseph-johnson-v-michael-j-astrue-ca8-2011.