Joseph J. v. New York City Board of Elections

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Joseph J. v. New York City Board of Elections

224 A.D.2d 563, 638 N.Y.S.2d 358, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1214

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 15, 1996

StatusPublished

This text of 224 A.D.2d 563 (Joseph J. v. New York City Board of Elections) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Joseph J. v. New York City Board of Elections, 224 A.D.2d 563, 638 N.Y.S.2d 358, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1214 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1996).

Pincite

Opinion

—In a proceeding pursuant to Election Law article 16 to validate petitions designating Joseph Jeffries El, Ruth B. Gary, Sr., and Mary Walton-Parrish as candidates in a primary election to be held on March 7, 1996, for the Republican Party party positions of delegates, and Franklin Gary, Tydka C. Cooper, and Joyce Cardez as alternate delegates, respectively, for the 10th Congressional District to the 1996 Republican National Convention, the appeal is from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Garry, J.), dated January 30,1996, which, after a hearing, granted the application and denied the counterclaim to invalidate the petitions.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, without costs or disbursements (see, Matter of Bramwell v New York City Bd. of Elections, 224 AD2d 561 decided herewith]). Bracken, J. P., Sullivan, Santucci, Hart and Krausman, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—In a proceeding pursuant to Election Law article 16 to validate petitions designating Joseph Jeffries El, Ruth B. Gary, Sr., and Mary Walton-Parrish as candidates in a primary election to be held on March 7, 1996, for the Republican Party party positions of delegates, and Franklin Gary, Tydka C. Cooper, and Joyce Cardez as alternate delegates, respectively, for the 10th Congressional District to the 1996 Republican National Convention, the appeal is from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Garry, J.), dated January 30,1996, which, after a hearing, granted the application and denied the counterclaim to invalidate the petitions.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, without costs or disbursements (see, Matter of Bramwell v New York City Bd. of Elections, 224 AD2d 561 decided herewith]). Bracken, J. P., Sullivan, Santucci, Hart and Krausman, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

224 A.D.2d 563, 638 N.Y.S.2d 358, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1214, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/joseph-j-v-new-york-city-board-of-elections-nyappdiv-1996.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack