Joseph J. Segreto v. American Automobile Insurance Company

Fifth Circuit

Joseph J. Segreto v. American Automobile Insurance Company

239 F.2d 641, 1957 U.S. App. LEXIS 3028

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided January 16, 1957·No. 16119_1·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In an intersectional automobile accident case tried without a jury, the district court, after making full and clear findings of fact and conclusions of law, entered judgment for the defendant. The findings of fact are certainly not clearly erroneous. Rule 52(a), Fed.Rules Civ. Proc., 28 U.S.C.A. Indeed, they are not seriously attacked. We agree with the conclusions of law and think that the judgment was properly entered.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

In an intersectional automobile accident case tried without a jury, the district court, after making full and clear findings of fact and conclusions of law, entered judgment for the defendant. The findings of fact are certainly not clearly erroneous. Rule 52(a), Fed.Rules Civ. Proc., 28 U.S.C.A. Indeed, they are not seriously attacked. We agree with the conclusions of law and think that the judgment was properly entered.

Affirmed.

Joseph J. Segreto v. American Automobile Insurance Company, 239 F.2d 641, 1957 U.S. App. LEXIS 3028 (5th Cir. 1957).

Pincite

239 F.2d 641 (Joseph J. Segreto v. American Automobile Insurance Company) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related