Joseph J. Ledoux v. District of Columbia
This text of 841 F.2d 400 (Joseph J. Ledoux v. District of Columbia) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
841 F.2d 400
56 Fair Empl.Prac.Cas. 1296, 268 U.S.App.D.C. 278
Joseph J. LEDOUX, Appellant,
v.
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA.
Nos. 86-5377, 86-5378.
United States Court of Appeals,
District of Columbia Circuit.
March 4, 1988.
Before WALD, Chief Judge, ROBINSON, MIKVA, EDWARDS, RUTH BADER GINSBURG, STARR, SILBERMAN, BUCKLEY, WILLIAMS, D.H. GINSBURG and SENTELLE, Circuit Judges.
ORDER
Upon consideration of the joint motion to remand and of this Court's en banc order of February 26, 1988,
It is ordered, by the Court en banc, on its own motion, that the opinion, the opinion concurring in part and dissenting in part and the judgment, 820 F.2d 1293, all of June 16, 1987, be, and the same hereby are, vacated.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
841 F.2d 400, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/joseph-j-ledoux-v-district-of-columbia-cadc-1988.