Joseph Horne Co. v. United States

18 Cust. Ct. 402, 1947 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 526
United States Customs Court·Decided February 20, 1947·No. No. 6904; Entry No. 710, etc.·Published

Opinion

Oliver, Presiding Judge:

These appeals for reappraisement have been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the parties hereto:

(Stipulation omitted.)

On the agreed facts I find the foreign value, as that value is defined in section 402 (c) of the Tariff Act of 1930 as amended by the Administrative Act of 1938, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise here involved, and that such values are the unit invoice prices, less 2)4 per centum, plus invoiced cost of packing, in reappraisement 157881-A; the invoiced unit prices, less 3 per centum, plus 25 per centum, packed, in reappraisements 159697-A and 160367-A; and the invoiced unit prices of items 2054 and 2055, less 2 per centum, plus pro rata share of cost of packing, in reappraisement 159696-A. Insofar as the appeals relate to all other merchandise they are hereby dismissed.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Joseph Horne Co. v. United States, 18 Cust. Ct. 402, 1947 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 526 (cusc 1947).

18 Cust. Ct. 402 (Joseph Horne Co. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.