Joseph Hepburn v. United States

Sixth Circuit

Joseph Hepburn v. United States

197 F.2d 864, 1952 U.S. App. LEXIS 2700

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

DecidedJuly 3, 1952

Docket11502_1

StatusPublished

This text of 197 F.2d 864 (Joseph Hepburn v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Joseph Hepburn v. United States, 197 F.2d 864, 1952 U.S. App. LEXIS 2700 (6th Cir. 1952).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This case came on to be heard upon the record and briefs and argument of counsel for appellant.

And it appearing that upon arraignment appellant pleaded guilty to the crimes of kidnaping and violation of the Motor Vehicle Act, as charged in the indictment;

And it appearing that at arraignment the court appointed experienced counsel to represent appellant, and that appellant, although apprised that he could change his plea of guilty, failed to change his plea;

And it appearing that subsequent to sentence a petition for writ of habeas corpus was filed by appellant in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia and was dismissed after extensive hearing:

And no reversible error appearing in the record:

The order of the District Court denying appellant’s motion to vacate sentence be, and it hereby is, affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This case came on to be heard upon the record and briefs and argument of counsel for appellant.

And it appearing that upon arraignment appellant pleaded guilty to the crimes of kidnaping and violation of the Motor Vehicle Act, as charged in the indictment;

And it appearing that at arraignment the court appointed experienced counsel to represent appellant, and that appellant, although apprised that he could change his plea of guilty, failed to change his plea;

And it appearing that subsequent to sentence a petition for writ of habeas corpus was filed by appellant in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia and was dismissed after extensive hearing:

And no reversible error appearing in the record:

The order of the District Court denying appellant’s motion to vacate sentence be, and it hereby is, affirmed.

197 F.2d 864 (First Circuit, 1952)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

197 F.2d 864, 1952 U.S. App. LEXIS 2700, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/joseph-hepburn-v-united-states-ca6-1952.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack