Joseph H. Meyer Bros. v. Higgins

232 A.D. 783
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided February 15, 1931·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Orders denying motions to vacate notices of examination before trial modified so as to provide that at the time of each examination the protection of secrecy be imposed with respect to the evidence adduced, so that such evidence, in so far as it concerns the secret process particularly, may not become available to other than the parties to the litigation and the court or referee hearing the testimony upon the examinations and upon the trial. As so modified the orders are affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements to respondent. Examinations to proceed on five days’ notice at the place and hour stated in the respective orders. -No opinion. Lazansky, P. J., Young, Hagarty, Carswell and Tompkins, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Joseph H. Meyer Bros. v. Higgins, 232 A.D. 783 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1931).

232 A.D. 783 (Joseph H. Meyer Bros. v. Higgins) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

La Monte v. Smith
10 A.D.2d 678 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1960)
Griffin Manufacturing Co. v. Gold Dust Corp.
245 A.D. 385 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1935)
American Seal-Kap Corp. v. Smith Lee Co.
154 Misc. 176 (New York Supreme Court, 1935)
Hillick v. Edwards & Son
143 Misc. 277 (New York Supreme Court, 1932)