Joseph H. Meyer Bros. v. Higgins
This text of 231 A.D. 832 (Joseph H. Meyer Bros. v. Higgins) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order consolidating actions and changing the place of trial in the second above-entitled action reversed upon the law and the facts, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied, with ten dollars costs. One action is in equity and the other in law and they do not grow out of the same transaction. The two causes are independent of each other, the issues involved separate and distinct, and two trials will involve no duplication. Under such circumstances, the actions should not have been consolidated. Lazansky, P. J., Young, Hagarty, Carswell and Tompkins, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
231 A.D. 832, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/joseph-h-meyer-bros-v-higgins-nyappdiv-1930.