Joseph George Heid, IV v. State of Florida
This text of Joseph George Heid, IV v. State of Florida (Joseph George Heid, IV v. State of Florida) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
SIXTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _____________________________
Case No. 6D2024-0016 Lower Tribunal No. 2016-CF-005268 _____________________________
JOSEPH GEORGE HEID, IV,
Appellant,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA,
Appellee. _____________________________
Appeal from the Circuit Court for Orange County. Luis F. Calderon, Judge.
April 24, 2026
PER CURIAM.
We affirm the postconviction court’s denial of Appellant’s postconviction
motion in its entirety, without prejudice to the postconviction court addressing,
pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850, Appellant’s pending
postconviction motion regarding Appellant’s alleged newly discovered video-
evidence claim.
AFFIRMED.
TRAVER, C.J., and KAMOUTSAS and PRATT, JJ., concur. Roderick Ford, of The Methodist Law Centre, Gainesville, for Appellant.
James Uthmeier, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Alyssa M. Williams and Rebecca Rock McGuigan, Assistant Attorneys General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF TIMELY FILED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Joseph George Heid, IV v. State of Florida, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/joseph-george-heid-iv-v-state-of-florida-fladistctapp-2026.