Joseph Frost & Co. v. Willis

13 Vt. 202
CourtSupreme Court of Vermont
DecidedJanuary 15, 1841
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 13 Vt. 202 (Joseph Frost & Co. v. Willis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Vermont primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Joseph Frost & Co. v. Willis, 13 Vt. 202 (Vt. 1841).

Opinion

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Bennett, J.

It seems that, in January, 1839, the defendant sold out his place at Westford, and was about to leave the town, and under these circumstances, his wife, b.y his consent, left and came to Bridport, with her two children; and while she and her children remained at that place, the plaintiffs furnished her with goods, on the credit of her husband, to the amount of thirty-four dollars, and the auditor has found the fact that they were necessary for her comfort, and that of her children.

The husband, it is well settled, is liable for necessaries furnished, on his credit, to the wife, while they live apart, as well as when they cohabit, and, especially, in a case where they live apart by his consent. His assent in such cases will be presumed, unless the contrary appears. Chancy on Hus. and Wife, 28. But this case furnishes evidence that the husband intended to furnish his wife and children a support, as he was bound to do by law. He advised her to take a room at Bridport, and furnished her with some trifling things. He also placed in her hands his note for fifty dollars, to be used by her if she found it indispensably necessary. The defendant, also, subsequently, promised to pay the account, though not then advised of the amount. This is evidence of the assent of the husband, and there can be no doubt that, upon the facts reported by the auditor, the plaintiff should •ecover. The judgment of the county court is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Forrester v. Hurtt
18 Haw. 215 (Hawaii Supreme Court, 1907)
Morris v. Palmer
39 N.H. 123 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1859)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
13 Vt. 202, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/joseph-frost-co-v-willis-vt-1841.