Joseph F. O'Brien v. William P. Rogers, Attorney General of the United States

D.C. Circuit

Joseph F. O'Brien v. William P. Rogers, Attorney General of the United States

269 F.2d 227, 106 U.S. App. D.C. 36, 1959 U.S. App. LEXIS 3835

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit·Decided May 21, 1959·No. 14896_1·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant’s dismissal from a position in the Department of Justice was sustained by the Civil Service Commission’s Board of Appeals and Review on March 4, 1955. On June 29, 1955, the Commission declined to reopen the matter. On March 27, 1958, appellant filed a complaint “for illegal separation from government service.” The District Court granted appellee’s motion for summary judgment. The claim was barred by laches. We need not consider appellee’s other contentions.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Appellant’s dismissal from a position in the Department of Justice was sustained by the Civil Service Commission’s Board of Appeals and Review on March 4, 1955. On June 29, 1955, the Commission declined to reopen the matter. On March 27, 1958, appellant filed a complaint “for illegal separation from government service.” The District Court granted appellee’s motion for summary judgment. The claim was barred by laches. We need not consider appellee’s other contentions.

Affirmed.

Joseph F. O'Brien v. William P. Rogers, Attorney General of the United States, 269 F.2d 227, 106 U.S. App. D.C. 36, 1959 U.S. App. LEXIS 3835 (D.C. Cir. 1959).

Pincite

269 F.2d 227 (Joseph F. O'Brien v. William P. Rogers, Attorney General of the United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related