Joseph F. Kisting and Anchor Sales Co. v. Westchester Fire Insurance Company

416 F.2d 967
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
DecidedOctober 2, 1969
Docket17317
StatusPublished
Cited by40 cases

This text of 416 F.2d 967 (Joseph F. Kisting and Anchor Sales Co. v. Westchester Fire Insurance Company) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Joseph F. Kisting and Anchor Sales Co. v. Westchester Fire Insurance Company, 416 F.2d 967 (7th Cir. 1969).

Opinion

CAMPBELL, District Judge. *

Joseph F. Kisting and Anchor Sales and Service, Incorporated, plaintiffs-appellants were named insureds on a policy of insurance issued by the defendantappellee, Westchester Fire Insurance Company, and insuring certain farm property located in the State of Wisconsin. On May 30, 1966 the buildings were damaged by fire.

Pursuant to the provisions of the policy the insurer served notice on plaintiff Kisting that it desired to take his examination under oath. The notice was dated August 30, 1966 and was signed by an attorney for the insurer, Daniel J. Leahy as “Representative for said Insurance Company”. The examination was scheduled for September 7, 1966. Plaintiff Kisting attended the examination but refused to answer a number of relevant questions.

Defendant subsequently filed a motion for summary judgment based on the refusal to answer these questions. Upon full consideration of all of the issues presented, the District Court granted defendant’s motion for summary judgment and dismissed plaintiffs’ action, with prejudice.

We have reviewed the entire record and, upon full consideration of the arguments advanced and authorities cited by the parties, we find that the notice of examination was in all respects proper and that under the law of Wisconsin or Illinois, plaintiff Kisting’s refusal to answer the many questions asked him at the examination was a breach of the policy provisions and a bar to recovery. There being no genuine issue of fact in dispute the award of summary judgment was proper. Ashwell & Company, Inc. v. Transamerica Insurance Company, 407 F.2d 762 (7 Cir. 1969). All questions of law were thoroughly discussed and correctly resolved in the excellent memorandum of the District Judge ruling on the motion for summary judgment. Kisting v. Westchester Fire Insurance Company, 290 F.Supp. 141 (W.D.Wis. 1968). That memorandum is hereby adopted and incorporated herein.

Accordingly, we affirm.

*

Chief Judge Campbell of the Northern District of Illinois is sitting by designation.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Tug Valley Pharmacy v. All Below
West Virginia Supreme Court, 2015
Tug Valley Pharmacy, LLC v. All Below
773 S.E.2d 627 (West Virginia Supreme Court, 2015)
Farmers Mutual of Tennessee v. Jennifer Atkins
Court of Appeals of Tennessee, 2014
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. Curran
83 So. 3d 793 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2011)
Spears v. Tennessee Farmers Mutual Insurance Co.
300 S.W.3d 671 (Court of Appeals of Tennessee, 2009)
Rubenstein v. Rubenstein
851 A.2d 1262 (Connecticut Superior Court, 2004)
State Farm Indemnity Co. v. Warrington
795 A.2d 324 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 2002)
Travis v. Finley
548 S.E.2d 906 (Court of Appeals of Virginia, 2001)
Powell v. U S Fidelity Insur
Fourth Circuit, 1996
Joe's Pizza, Inc. v. Aetna Life & Casualty Co.
675 A.2d 441 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1996)
Mello v. Hingham Mutual Fire Insurance
421 Mass. 333 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1995)
Powell v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.
855 F. Supp. 858 (E.D. Virginia, 1994)
Lee v. United Fire & Cas. Co.
607 So. 2d 685 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1992)
Watson v. National Surety Corp. of Chicago
468 N.W.2d 448 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1991)
Saucier v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.
765 F. Supp. 334 (S.D. Mississippi, 1991)
State Farm Fire & Casualty Insurance v. Walker
459 N.W.2d 605 (Court of Appeals of Wisconsin, 1990)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
416 F.2d 967, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/joseph-f-kisting-and-anchor-sales-co-v-westchester-fire-insurance-ca7-1969.