Joseph Eugene Jackson v. State
This text of Joseph Eugene Jackson v. State (Joseph Eugene Jackson v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH
NO. 02-12-00012-CR
JOSEPH EUGENE JACKSON APPELLANT
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS STATE
----------
FROM COUNTY CRIMINAL COURT NO. 9 OF TARRANT COUNTY
MEMORANDUM OPINION 1
Appellant Joseph Eugene Jackson appeals from his conviction for
terroristic threat. A jury convicted him of the offense, and the trial court
sentenced him to 180 days’ confinement. Appellant’s court-appointed appellate
counsel has filed a motion to withdraw as counsel and a brief in support of that
motion. Counsel’s brief and motion meet the requirements of Anders v.
1 See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4. California 2 by presenting a professional evaluation of the record demonstrating
why there are no arguable grounds for relief. Although Appellant was given an
opportunity to file a pro se brief, he has not done so.
After an appellant’s court-appointed counsel files a motion to withdraw on
the ground that the appeal is frivolous and fulfills the requirements of Anders, this
court is obligated to undertake an independent examination of the record. 3 Only
then may we grant counsel’s motion to withdraw. 4
We have carefully reviewed counsel’s brief and the record. We agree with
counsel that this appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit; we find nothing in
the record that arguably might support the appeal. 5 Accordingly, we grant
counsel’s motion to withdraw and affirm the trial court’s judgment.
PER CURIAM
PANEL: DAUPHINOT, J.; LIVINGSTON, C.J.; and GARDNER, J.
DO NOT PUBLISH Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b)
DELIVERED: September 26, 2013
2 386 U.S. 738, 87 S. Ct. 1396 (1967). 3 See Stafford v. State, 813 S.W.2d 503, 511 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991); Mays v. State, 904 S.W.2d 920, 922–23 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth 1995, no pet.). 4 See Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 82–83, 109 S. Ct. 346, 351 (1988). 5 See Bledsoe v. State, 178 S.W.3d 824, 827–28 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Joseph Eugene Jackson v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/joseph-eugene-jackson-v-state-texapp-2013.