Joseph Eugene Jackson v. State

Opinion

COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH

NO. 02-12-00012-CR

JOSEPH EUGENE JACKSON APPELLANT

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS STATE

----------

FROM COUNTY CRIMINAL COURT NO. 9 OF TARRANT COUNTY

MEMORANDUM OPINION 1

Appellant Joseph Eugene Jackson appeals from his conviction for

terroristic threat. A jury convicted him of the offense, and the trial court

sentenced him to 180 days’ confinement. Appellant’s court-appointed appellate

counsel has filed a motion to withdraw as counsel and a brief in support of that

motion. Counsel’s brief and motion meet the requirements of Anders v.

1 See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4. California 2 by presenting a professional evaluation of the record demonstrating

why there are no arguable grounds for relief. Although Appellant was given an

opportunity to file a pro se brief, he has not done so.

After an appellant’s court-appointed counsel files a motion to withdraw on

the ground that the appeal is frivolous and fulfills the requirements of Anders, this

court is obligated to undertake an independent examination of the record. 3 Only

then may we grant counsel’s motion to withdraw. 4

We have carefully reviewed counsel’s brief and the record. We agree with

counsel that this appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit; we find nothing in

the record that arguably might support the appeal. 5 Accordingly, we grant

counsel’s motion to withdraw and affirm the trial court’s judgment.

PER CURIAM

PANEL: DAUPHINOT, J.; LIVINGSTON, C.J.; and GARDNER, J.

DO NOT PUBLISH Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b)

DELIVERED: September 26, 2013

2 386 U.S. 738, 87 S. Ct. 1396 (1967). 3 See Stafford v. State, 813 S.W.2d 503, 511 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991); Mays v. State, 904 S.W.2d 920, 922–23 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth 1995, no pet.). 4 See Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 82–83, 109 S. Ct. 346, 351 (1988). 5 See Bledsoe v. State, 178 S.W.3d 824, 827–28 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005).