Joseph Eugene Jackson v. State

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedSeptember 26, 2013
Docket02-12-00012-CR
StatusPublished

This text of Joseph Eugene Jackson v. State (Joseph Eugene Jackson v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Joseph Eugene Jackson v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2013).

Opinion

COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH

NO. 02-12-00012-CR

JOSEPH EUGENE JACKSON APPELLANT

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS STATE

----------

FROM COUNTY CRIMINAL COURT NO. 9 OF TARRANT COUNTY

MEMORANDUM OPINION 1

Appellant Joseph Eugene Jackson appeals from his conviction for

terroristic threat. A jury convicted him of the offense, and the trial court

sentenced him to 180 days’ confinement. Appellant’s court-appointed appellate

counsel has filed a motion to withdraw as counsel and a brief in support of that

motion. Counsel’s brief and motion meet the requirements of Anders v.

1 See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4. California 2 by presenting a professional evaluation of the record demonstrating

why there are no arguable grounds for relief. Although Appellant was given an

opportunity to file a pro se brief, he has not done so.

After an appellant’s court-appointed counsel files a motion to withdraw on

the ground that the appeal is frivolous and fulfills the requirements of Anders, this

court is obligated to undertake an independent examination of the record. 3 Only

then may we grant counsel’s motion to withdraw. 4

We have carefully reviewed counsel’s brief and the record. We agree with

counsel that this appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit; we find nothing in

the record that arguably might support the appeal. 5 Accordingly, we grant

counsel’s motion to withdraw and affirm the trial court’s judgment.

PER CURIAM

PANEL: DAUPHINOT, J.; LIVINGSTON, C.J.; and GARDNER, J.

DO NOT PUBLISH Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b)

DELIVERED: September 26, 2013

2 386 U.S. 738, 87 S. Ct. 1396 (1967). 3 See Stafford v. State, 813 S.W.2d 503, 511 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991); Mays v. State, 904 S.W.2d 920, 922–23 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth 1995, no pet.). 4 See Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 82–83, 109 S. Ct. 346, 351 (1988). 5 See Bledsoe v. State, 178 S.W.3d 824, 827–28 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)
Penson v. Ohio
488 U.S. 75 (Supreme Court, 1988)
Mays v. State
904 S.W.2d 920 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1995)
Stafford v. State
813 S.W.2d 503 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1991)
Bledsoe v. State
178 S.W.3d 824 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 2005)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Joseph Eugene Jackson v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/joseph-eugene-jackson-v-state-texapp-2013.