JOSEPH EDWARD HAAS v. STATE OF FLORIDA
This text of JOSEPH EDWARD HAAS v. STATE OF FLORIDA (JOSEPH EDWARD HAAS v. STATE OF FLORIDA) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT
JOSEPH EDWARD HAAS, Appellant,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee.
No. 4D19-2636
[March 5, 2020]
Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, Martin County; Sherwood Bauer, Judge; L.T. Case No. 432013CF000099A.
Joseph Edward Haas, Daytona Beach, pro se.
Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Georgina Jimenez- Orosa, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed.
WARNER, MAY and CONNER, JJ., concur.
* * *
Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
JOSEPH EDWARD HAAS v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/joseph-edward-haas-v-state-of-florida-fladistctapp-2020.