Joseph E. Taylor v. City of New Albany, Floyd County, New Albany Police Department

Seventh Circuit

Joseph E. Taylor v. City of New Albany, Floyd County, New Albany Police Department

979 F.2d 87

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

DecidedJanuary 19, 1993

Docket91-3670

StatusPublished

This text of 979 F.2d 87 (Joseph E. Taylor v. City of New Albany, Floyd County, New Albany Police Department) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Joseph E. Taylor v. City of New Albany, Floyd County, New Albany Police Department, 979 F.2d 87 (7th Cir. 1993).

Pincite

Opinion

This matter comes before the court for its consideration upon the request for leave to proceed as a pauper on appeal filed by the appellant on 1/29/92.

This court has carefully reviewed the final order of the district court, the record on appeal and the appellant’s motion. Based on this review, the court has determined that any issues which could be raised are insubstantial and the filing of briefs would not be helpful to the court’s consideration of the issues. See Mather v. Village of Mundelein, 869 F.2d 356, 357 (7th Cir.1989) (per curiam) (court can decide case on motions papers and record where briefing would be a waste of time and no member of the panel desires briefing or argument). Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED that the appellant’s motion for leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis is DENIED and the district court is summarily AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

This matter comes before the court for its consideration upon the request for leave to proceed as a pauper on appeal filed by the appellant on 1/29/92.

This court has carefully reviewed the final order of the district court, the record on appeal and the appellant’s motion. Based on this review, the court has determined that any issues which could be raised are insubstantial and the filing of briefs would not be helpful to the court’s consideration of the issues. See Mather v. Village of Mundelein, 869 F.2d 356, 357 (7th Cir.1989) (per curiam) (court can decide case on motions papers and record where briefing would be a waste of time and no member of the panel desires briefing or argument). Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED that the appellant’s motion for leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis is DENIED and the district court is summarily AFFIRMED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

979 F.2d 87, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/joseph-e-taylor-v-city-of-new-albany-floyd-county-new-albany-police-ca7-1993.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack