Joseph E. Piatt v. United States

D.C. Circuit

Joseph E. Piatt v. United States

329 F.2d 883, 117 U.S. App. D.C. 315

CourtCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

DecidedFebruary 20, 1964

Docket18118_1

StatusPublished

Cited by5 cases

This text of 329 F.2d 883 (Joseph E. Piatt v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Joseph E. Piatt v. United States, 329 F.2d 883, 117 U.S. App. D.C. 315 (D.C. Cir. 1964).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Counsel appointed by this court to represent the appellant have presented for our consideration, by brief and oral argument, the only issues fairly raised by the record. Having examined these issues, we find them without sufficient merit to warrant reversal. Assigned counsel’s effort, however, in presenting the issues available, and thus insuring an appeal for an indigent defendant, is in the best tradition of the bar.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Counsel appointed by this court to represent the appellant have presented for our consideration, by brief and oral argument, the only issues fairly raised by the record. Having examined these issues, we find them without sufficient merit to warrant reversal. Assigned counsel’s effort, however, in presenting the issues available, and thus insuring an appeal for an indigent defendant, is in the best tradition of the bar.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

329 F.2d 883, 117 U.S. App. D.C. 315, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/joseph-e-piatt-v-united-states-cadc-1964.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack