Joseph E. Piatt v. United States
329 F.2d 883, 117 U.S. App. D.C. 315
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit·Decided February 20, 1964·No. 18118_1·Published·Cited by 5 cases
Opinion
Counsel appointed by this court to represent the appellant have presented for our consideration, by brief and oral argument, the only issues fairly raised by the record. Having examined these issues, we find them without sufficient merit to warrant reversal. Assigned counsel’s effort, however, in presenting the issues available, and thus insuring an appeal for an indigent defendant, is in the best tradition of the bar.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Joseph E. Piatt v. United States, 329 F.2d 883, 117 U.S. App. D.C. 315 (D.C. Cir. 1964).
329 F.2d 883 (Joseph E. Piatt v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
United States v. Clayborne Jamison, Jr., United States of America v. Clayborne Jamison, Sr.
505 F.2d 407 (D.C. Circuit, 1974)
Richard G. Augenblick v. The United States
377 F.2d 586 (Court of Claims, 1967)
Anthony Williams v. United States
345 F.2d 733 (D.C. Circuit, 1965)
Richard E. Leigh v. United States
329 F.2d 883 (D.C. Circuit, 1964)