Joseph E. Brodigan and Irving "Ash" Resnick v. W.H. McCormack

704 F.2d 1073, 1983 U.S. App. LEXIS 28585
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedApril 25, 1983
Docket82-5370
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 704 F.2d 1073 (Joseph E. Brodigan and Irving "Ash" Resnick v. W.H. McCormack) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Joseph E. Brodigan and Irving "Ash" Resnick v. W.H. McCormack, 704 F.2d 1073, 1983 U.S. App. LEXIS 28585 (9th Cir. 1983).

Opinion

The notice of appeal filed on April 6,1982 has no effect because there was pending at the time that it was filed a motion for a new trial and, in the alternative, to amend findings of fact and conclusions of law previously submitted to the trial court. No new notice of appeal was filed within the prescribed time measured from the date of the entry of the order disposing of the motion. Fed.R.App.P. 4(a)(4). It is therefore ordered that the appeal be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. Griggs v. Provident Consumer Discount Company, - U.S. -, 103 S.Ct. 400, 74 L.Ed.2d 225 (1982).

DISMISSED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
704 F.2d 1073, 1983 U.S. App. LEXIS 28585, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/joseph-e-brodigan-and-irving-ash-resnick-v-wh-mccormack-ca9-1983.