Joseph Dry Goods Co. v. Home Pattern Co.

79 S.E. 356, 13 Ga. App. 467, 1913 Ga. App. LEXIS 208
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedSeptember 23, 1913
Docket4752
StatusPublished

This text of 79 S.E. 356 (Joseph Dry Goods Co. v. Home Pattern Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Joseph Dry Goods Co. v. Home Pattern Co., 79 S.E. 356, 13 Ga. App. 467, 1913 Ga. App. LEXIS 208 (Ga. Ct. App. 1913).

Opinion

Russell, J.

The written contract sued on being unambiguous in its terms, and it being admitted that the defendant had not complied with the provision of the contract which authorized the defendant to return to the plaintiff and receive credit for certain patterns not sold by the defendant, and there being no facts in evidence which would excuse the non-compliance with the contract, the plaintiff was entitled to recover the full amount sued for, and there was no error in directing the jury so to find. Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
79 S.E. 356, 13 Ga. App. 467, 1913 Ga. App. LEXIS 208, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/joseph-dry-goods-co-v-home-pattern-co-gactapp-1913.