Joseph Demetrius Farris v. the State of Texas
Opinion
IN THE TENTH COURT OF APPEALS
No. 10-21-00203-CR No. 10-21-00204-CR No. 10-21-00205-CR No. 10-21-00206-CR
JOSEPH DEMETRIUS FARRIS, Appellant v.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
From the 12th District Court Madison County, Texas Trial Court Nos. 18-13064, 18-13066, 18-13068, and 18-13070
SECOND ABATEMENT ORDER
Pursuant to a plea agreement, Appellant Joseph Demetrius Farris pleaded guilty
to possession of child pornography in Trial Court No. 18-13064; to aggravated sexual
assault of a child in Trial Court No. 18-13066; to aggravated sexual assault of a child in
Trial Court No. 18-13068; and to possession of child pornography in Trial Court No. 18-
13070. The trial court assessed Farris’s punishment at ten years, life, life, and ten years in prison, respectively. Farris appeals in each of these causes from the trial court’s denial of
his pretrial motion to suppress and from the trial court’s grant of the State’s pretrial
motion to exclude testimony of the affirmative defense of duress.
After the clerk’s record, the reporter’s record, a supplemental clerk’s record, and
the appellant’s brief had been filed in these appeals, we received the second supplemental
clerk’s records containing a State’s request for the trial court clerk to supplement the
clerk’s record with a copy of the “Findings of the Court.” The State’s request was filed
with the trial court clerk on February 9, 2022. The second supplemental clerk’s records
then contained the “Findings of the Court.” 1 The findings are not dated but were file-
stamped by the trial court clerk on February 16, 2022.
It was unclear when the trial court signed the “Findings of the Court” and whether
they were signed while the trial court had jurisdiction over these causes. Accordingly, in
an abundance of caution, we abated these causes to the trial court for entry of its findings.
We subsequently received a third supplemental clerk’s record in each of these
appeals containing a letter from the trial court clerk. The letter states as follows: The trial
court signed original “Findings of Fact” on August 1, 2021, in Trial Court No. 18-13138
“with all intention that they would be filed into all of Joseph Demetrius Farris’s cause
numbers.” 2 Due to an oversight, however, the August 1, 2021 “Findings of Fact” were
1At a hearing on May 12, 2021, Farris had made an oral request for specific findings on the trial court’s ruling. Farris has also filed a motion for leave to file a supplemental appellant’s brief in each of these appeals because the findings were not part of the appellate records until after he filed his appellant’s briefs.
2In Trial Court No. 18-13138, Farris was charged by indictment with continuous sexual abuse of a child. The trial court eventually signed an order dismissing the charges against Farris, and in Appellate Court No. 10-21-00207-CR, we dismissed for want of jurisdiction Farris’s attempt to appeal from the trial court’s
Farris v. State Page 2 filed in only Trial Court No. 18-13138. When it was discovered that the August 1, 2021
“Findings of Fact” had not been filed in all of Farris’s cause numbers, the trial court
signed the “Findings of the Court” for the rest of the cases and filed those in the
appropriate cause numbers on February 16, 2022.
We reinstate these appeals to issue this order. Based on the trial court clerk’s letter,
the trial court signed the “Findings of the Court” that we received in the second
supplemental clerk’s records after the trial court’s jurisdiction over these causes had
expired. Accordingly, we again abate these causes to the trial court to vest the trial court
with jurisdiction to enter its findings within 21 days of the date of this Order. A
supplemental clerk’s record, containing the trial court’s findings, shall be filed within 28
days of the date of this Order.
PER CURIAM
Before Chief Justice Gray, Justice Johnson, and Justice Smith Order issued and filed June 15, 2022 RWR
order dismissing the charges. Farris v. State, Nos. 10-21-00207-CR & 10-21-00208-CR, 2021 WL 4462213, at *1 (Tex. App.—Waco Sept. 29, 2021, no pet.) (mem. op., not designated for publication).
Farris v. State Page 3
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Joseph Demetrius Farris v. the State of Texas (Joseph Demetrius Farris v. the State of Texas) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.