Joseph Clark v. State of Nevada, et al.
Opinion
3 kee 4 JOSEPH CLARK, Case No. 3:23-CV-00488-MMD-CLB 5 Plaintiff, ORDER TO FILE OPPOSITION TO 6 y MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT STATE OF NEVADA, et a/., ° Defendants. 9 10 On September 8, 2025, Defendants filed a motion for summary judgment. (ECF Nos. 37, 39.) Plaintiff was given notice of the motion pursuant to the requirements of Klingele v. Eikenberry, 849 F.2d 409 (9th Cir. 1988), and Rand v. Rowland, 154 F.3d 952 (9th Cir. 1998). (ECF No. 38.) To date, Plaintiff has not filed an opposition. 14 The Court will sua sponte grant Plaintiff one extension of time to Friday, October 341, 2025, to file an opposition to the motion for summary judgment. No further extensions 16 | of time shall be granted. If Plaintiff fails to file an opposition, the motion will be submitted 17 | to the court for decision. 19 DATED: October 2, 2025 20 □
21 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Joseph Clark v. State of Nevada, et al. (Joseph Clark v. State of Nevada, et al.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.