Joseph Clark v. State of Nevada, et al.
This text of Joseph Clark v. State of Nevada, et al. (Joseph Clark v. State of Nevada, et al.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, D. Nevada primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 3 kee 4 JOSEPH CLARK, Case No. 3:23-CV-00488-MMD-CLB 5 Plaintiff, ORDER TO FILE OPPOSITION TO 6 y MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT STATE OF NEVADA, et a/., ° Defendants. 9 10 On September 8, 2025, Defendants filed a motion for summary judgment. (ECF Nos. 37, 39.) Plaintiff was given notice of the motion pursuant to the requirements of Klingele v. Eikenberry, 849 F.2d 409 (9th Cir. 1988), and Rand v. Rowland, 154 F.3d 952 (9th Cir. 1998). (ECF No. 38.) To date, Plaintiff has not filed an opposition. 14 The Court will sua sponte grant Plaintiff one extension of time to Friday, October 341, 2025, to file an opposition to the motion for summary judgment. No further extensions 16 | of time shall be granted. If Plaintiff fails to file an opposition, the motion will be submitted 17 | to the court for decision. 18 IT IS SO ORDERED. 19 DATED: October 2, 2025 20 □
21 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Joseph Clark v. State of Nevada, et al., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/joseph-clark-v-state-of-nevada-et-al-nvd-2025.