Joseph Chierico v. United States
This text of 346 F.2d 187 (Joseph Chierico v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Joseph Chierico appeals from the judgment of the District Court based upon a jury verdict whereby he was found guilty of accepting wagers as defined in 26 U.S.C.A. § 4421(1) (A) without having previously registered and paid the special occupational tax as required under 26 U.S.C.A. §§ 4411, 4412, 4901(a) and 7262.
This appeal is based solely on the contention that there was not sufficient evidence from which a jury could be permitted to conclude that appellant was guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. While the evidence by which Chierico’s connection with the wagering operation was circumstantial, we have no doubt in concluding that the circumstances testified to, including statements made by appellant himself touching on what the jury could properly infer was the illegal operation, were more than sufficient to warrant submission of the issue to the jury.
The judgment is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
346 F.2d 187, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/joseph-chierico-v-united-states-ca5-1965.