Joseph C. Hawthorn v. Russell Neinast and Union Pacific Resources Group, Inc.
This text of Joseph C. Hawthorn v. Russell Neinast and Union Pacific Resources Group, Inc. (Joseph C. Hawthorn v. Russell Neinast and Union Pacific Resources Group, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NUMBER 13-05-036-CV
COURT OF APPEALS
THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG
____________________________________________________________________
JOSEPH C. HAWTHORN, Appellant,
v.
RUSSELL NEINAST, ET AL., Appellees.
____________________________________________________________________
On appeal from the 21st District Court
of Washington County, Texas.
____________________________________________________________________
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Before Justices Hinojosa, Yañez, and Garza
Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam
Appellant, JOSEPH C. HAWTHORN, perfected an appeal from a judgment entered by the 21st District Court of Washington County, Texas, in cause number 32040. After the notice of appeal was filed, appellant filed a motion to withdraw appeal. In the motion, appellant states that he no longer wishes to prosecute this appeal. Appellant requests that this Court dismiss the appeal.
The Court, having considered the documents on file and appellant’s motion to withdraw appeal, is of the opinion that the motion should be granted. Appellant’s motion to withdraw appeal is granted, and the appeal is hereby DISMISSED.
PER CURIAM
Memorandum Opinion delivered and filed this
the 10th day of February, 2005.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Joseph C. Hawthorn v. Russell Neinast and Union Pacific Resources Group, Inc., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/joseph-c-hawthorn-v-russell-neinast-and-union-paci-texapp-2005.