Joseph C. Canizaro v. Kohlmeyer & Company

512 F.2d 484, 1975 U.S. App. LEXIS 14842
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided May 2, 1975·No. 74-2014·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

The appellant, Canizaro, brought suit in the Southern District of New York against a number of New York defendants for damages for claimed violations of Section 12(2) of the Securities Act of 1933, Title 15 U.S.C. § 777(2), and 17 C.F.R. § 240.10b-5 promulgated pursuant to § 10 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, Title 15 U.S.C. § 78j, and on various state law principles in connection with a purchase by Canizaro of certain securities in May 1970. A New Orleans, Louisiana based registered broker-dealer, Kohlmeyer & Company (Kohlmeyer), the appellee herein, served as Canizaro’s broker or seller in the actual consummation of the purchase, and was named as a defendant in addition to the New York defendants. Upon Kohlmeyer’s motion, the case against the appellee was severed and transferred to the Eastern District of Louisiana.

Following a full-scale trial on the merits, the district court found for the de *485 fendant-appellee on all counts 1 and entered the judgment appealed from. For reasons well stated by the trial court we agree that the plaintiff-appellant Cañizaro failed to prove a violation of either § 12(2) or of Rule 10b — 5, or to prove a case under applicable Louisiana law.

The judgment below was right, and is in all respects

Affirmed.

1

. The Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law of the trial court are reported at 370 F.Supp. 282.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Joseph C. Canizaro v. Kohlmeyer & Company, 512 F.2d 484, 1975 U.S. App. LEXIS 14842 (5th Cir. 1975).

512 F.2d 484 (Joseph C. Canizaro v. Kohlmeyer & Company) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related