Joseph Bisceglia & Sons, Inc. v. Colao
238 A.D. 854
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMarch 15, 1933
StatusPublished
This text of 238 A.D. 854 (Joseph Bisceglia & Sons, Inc. v. Colao) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Joseph Bisceglia & Sons, Inc. v. Colao, 238 A.D. 854 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1933).
Opinion
Order unanimously affirmed, with costs. The facts are in dispute. The right of the petitioner to a mandamus order is not clear. He should proceed by action to recover the sum claimed to be due under the contract. Present — Lazansky, P. J., Young, Hagarty, Tompkins and Davis, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
238 A.D. 854, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/joseph-bisceglia-sons-inc-v-colao-nyappdiv-1933.