Joseph Anthony Pagliochini v. United States
264 F.2d 583, 105 U.S. App. D.C. 110, 1959 U.S. App. LEXIS 4284
Opinion
This is an appeal from a conviction for forging and uttering. 18 U.S.C. § 495 (1952). The alleged error on which appellant relies — failure to charge that *584 a certain witness was an accomplice and that his testimony should be viewed with caution — was not raised in the District Court, and we find no sufficient reason on this record to exercise our authority under Fed.R.Crim.P. 52(b), 18 U.S.C., to review it here.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Joseph Anthony Pagliochini v. United States, 264 F.2d 583, 105 U.S. App. D.C. 110, 1959 U.S. App. LEXIS 4284 (D.C. Cir. 1959).
264 F.2d 583 (Joseph Anthony Pagliochini v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
United States v. Nicholas Lasorsa and Salvatore Caio
480 F.2d 522 (Second Circuit, 1973)
United States v. Charles George, Jr., United States of America v. J. C. Gulley
319 F.2d 77 (Sixth Circuit, 1963)