Joseph Anthony Pagliochini v. United States

D.C. Circuit

Joseph Anthony Pagliochini v. United States

264 F.2d 583, 105 U.S. App. D.C. 110, 1959 U.S. App. LEXIS 4284

CourtCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

DecidedMarch 5, 1959

Docket14671

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 264 F.2d 583 (Joseph Anthony Pagliochini v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Joseph Anthony Pagliochini v. United States, 264 F.2d 583, 105 U.S. App. D.C. 110, 1959 U.S. App. LEXIS 4284 (D.C. Cir. 1959).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from a conviction for forging and uttering. 18 U.S.C. § 495 (1952). The alleged error on which appellant relies — failure to charge that *584 a certain witness was an accomplice and that his testimony should be viewed with caution — was not raised in the District Court, and we find no sufficient reason on this record to exercise our authority under Fed.R.Crim.P. 52(b), 18 U.S.C., to review it here.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from a conviction for forging and uttering. 18 U.S.C. § 495 (1952). The alleged error on which appellant relies — failure to charge that *584 a certain witness was an accomplice and that his testimony should be viewed with caution — was not raised in the District Court, and we find no sufficient reason on this record to exercise our authority under Fed.R.Crim.P. 52(b), 18 U.S.C., to review it here.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

264 F.2d 583, 105 U.S. App. D.C. 110, 1959 U.S. App. LEXIS 4284, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/joseph-anthony-pagliochini-v-united-states-cadc-1959.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack