Joseph Anthony Pagliochini v. United States

264 F.2d 583, 105 U.S. App. D.C. 110, 1959 U.S. App. LEXIS 4284
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit·Decided March 5, 1959·No. 14671·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from a conviction for forging and uttering. 18 U.S.C. § 495 (1952). The alleged error on which appellant relies — failure to charge that *584 a certain witness was an accomplice and that his testimony should be viewed with caution — was not raised in the District Court, and we find no sufficient reason on this record to exercise our authority under Fed.R.Crim.P. 52(b), 18 U.S.C., to review it here.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Joseph Anthony Pagliochini v. United States, 264 F.2d 583, 105 U.S. App. D.C. 110, 1959 U.S. App. LEXIS 4284 (D.C. Cir. 1959).

264 F.2d 583 (Joseph Anthony Pagliochini v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related