Joseph Anthony Butera v. United States

Fifth Circuit

Joseph Anthony Butera v. United States

455 F.2d 987, 1972 U.S. App. LEXIS 10636

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

DecidedMarch 20, 1972

Docket71-2835

StatusPublished

This text of 455 F.2d 987 (Joseph Anthony Butera v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Joseph Anthony Butera v. United States, 455 F.2d 987, 1972 U.S. App. LEXIS 10636 (5th Cir. 1972).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Affirmed. 1 See Local Rule 21. 2

1

. In seeking relief under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 appellant claims (i) the District Court was without jurisdiction because the Government failed to prove that the deposits of the burglarized bank were insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation and (ii) the District Court erred in refusing to order a mistrial after a Government witness was unable to identify evidence introduced against the defendant.

2

. See NLRB v. Amalgamated Clothing Workers of America, 5 Cir., 1970, 430 F.2d 966.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Affirmed. 1 See Local Rule 21. 2

1

. In seeking relief under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 appellant claims (i) the District Court was without jurisdiction because the Government failed to prove that the deposits of the burglarized bank were insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation and (ii) the District Court erred in refusing to order a mistrial after a Government witness was unable to identify evidence introduced against the defendant.

2

. See NLRB v. Amalgamated Clothing Workers of America, 5 Cir., 1970, 430 F.2d 966.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

455 F.2d 987, 1972 U.S. App. LEXIS 10636, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/joseph-anthony-butera-v-united-states-ca5-1972.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack