Joseph Albert Borgas v. the State of Texas
Opinion
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
NO. 03-21-00410-CR
Joseph Albert Borgas, Appellant
v.
The State of Texas, Appellee
FROM THE 20TH DISTRICT COURT OF MILAM COUNTY NO. CR26,806, THE HONORABLE JOHN YOUNGBLOOD, JUDGE PRESIDING
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Appellant Joseph Albert Borgas filed a notice of appeal from a judgment
adjudicating his guilt for the second-degree felony offense of aggravated assault with a deadly
weapon–family violence. See Tex. Penal Code § 22.02. The trial court certified that Borgas has
no right of appeal and has waived the right of appeal. Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal for
want of jurisdiction. See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(a)(2), (d); Greenwell v. Court of Appeals for the
Thirteenth Jud. Dist., 159 S.W.3d 645, 650 n.24 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005) (“While an appellate
court may require a trial court to certify whether there is a right to appeal, the appellate court
may not dictate the content of the certification.”).
__________________________________________ Darlene Byrne, Chief Justice
Before Chief Justice Byrne, Justices Triana and Smith
Dismissed for Want of Jurisdiction Filed: July 19, 2022
Do Not Publish
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Joseph Albert Borgas v. the State of Texas (Joseph Albert Borgas v. the State of Texas) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.