Joseph A. Stubler and Patricia Stubler, His Wife (Plaintiffs) v. The Baltimore and Ohio Railroad Company v. Joseph A. Stubler(third-Party Defendant), Joseph A. Stubler (Plaintiff Appellee). Joseph A. Stubler and Patricia Stubler, His Wife (Plaintiffs) v. The Baltimore and Ohio Railroad Company v. Joseph A. Stubler(third-Party Appellee). Joseph A. Stubler and Patricia Stubler, His Wife (Plaintiffs) v. The Baltimore and Ohio Railroad Company v. Joseph A. Stubler(third-Party Defendant), Patricia Stubler (Plaintiff Appellee)
This text of 354 F.2d 1003 (Joseph A. Stubler and Patricia Stubler, His Wife (Plaintiffs) v. The Baltimore and Ohio Railroad Company v. Joseph A. Stubler(third-Party Defendant), Joseph A. Stubler (Plaintiff Appellee). Joseph A. Stubler and Patricia Stubler, His Wife (Plaintiffs) v. The Baltimore and Ohio Railroad Company v. Joseph A. Stubler(third-Party Appellee). Joseph A. Stubler and Patricia Stubler, His Wife (Plaintiffs) v. The Baltimore and Ohio Railroad Company v. Joseph A. Stubler(third-Party Defendant), Patricia Stubler (Plaintiff Appellee)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
354 F.2d 1003
Joseph A. STUBLER and Patricia Stubler, His Wife (Plaintiffs)
v.
The BALTIMORE AND OHIO RAILROAD COMPANY, Appellant, v.
Joseph A. STUBLER(Third-Party Defendant), Joseph
A. Stubler (Plaintiff Appellee).
Joseph A. STUBLER and Patricia Stubler, His Wife (Plaintiffs)
v.
The BALTIMORE AND OHIO RAILROAD COMPANY, Appellant, v.
Joseph A. STUBLER(Third-Party Defendant, Appellee).
Joseph A. STUBLER and Patricia Stubler, His Wife (Plaintiffs)
v.
The BALTIMORE AND OHIO RAILROAD COMPANY, Appellant, v.
Joseph A. STUBLER(Third-Party Defendant), Patricia
Stubler (Plaintiff Appellee).
Nos. 15282-15284.
United States Court of Appeals Third Circuit.
Argued Nov. 5, 1965.
Decided Dec. 15, 1965, Rehearing Denied Jan. 27, 1966.
Appeals from the United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania; Wallace S. Gourley, Judge, D.C., 236 F.Supp. 754.
E. V. Buckley, Pittsburgh, Pa., for appellant.
Dennis C. Harrington and William S. Schweers, Pittsburgh, Pa. (McArdle, Harrington, Feeney & McLaughlin, Pittsburgh, Pa. on the brief), for appellees.
Wallace E. Edgecombe, Pittsburgh, Pa. (Royston, Robb, Leonard, Edgecombe & Miller, Pittsburgh, Pa., on the brief), for third-party defendant Stubler.
Before STALEY and FREEDMAN, Circuit Judges, and COHEN, District judge.
PER CURIAM.
These diversity cases were brought to recover damages for personal injuries sustained in a railroad grade crossing collision. Having thoroughly examined the record and considered the briefs of the parties, this court is satisfied that no reversible error was committed by the district court.
The judgments of the district court will be affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
354 F.2d 1003, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/joseph-a-stubler-and-patricia-stubler-his-wife-plaintiffs-v-the-ca3-1966.