Joseph A. Kurrus Livery & Undertaking Co. v. Crossett

Appellate Court of Illinois

Joseph A. Kurrus Livery & Undertaking Co. v. Crossett

199 Ill. App. 8

DecidedApril 17, 1916

StatusPublished

This text of 199 Ill. App. 8 (Joseph A. Kurrus Livery & Undertaking Co. v. Crossett) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Court of Illinois primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Joseph A. Kurrus Livery & Undertaking Co. v. Crossett, 199 Ill. App. 8 (Ill. Ct. App. 1916).

Pincite

Opinion

Mr. Presiding Justice Higbee

delivered the opinion of the court.

4. Appeal and error, § 1778*-—when verdict not reversed on ground of insufficiency of evidence. It is not ground of reversal that the jury believed the testimony of one side rather than another, although the number of witnesses who testified for the party against whom the jury found was greater than the number testifying for the other side.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mr. Presiding Justice Higbee

delivered the opinion of the court.

4. Appeal and error, § 1778*-—when verdict not reversed on ground of insufficiency of evidence. It is not ground of reversal that the jury believed the testimony of one side rather than another, although the number of witnesses who testified for the party against whom the jury found was greater than the number testifying for the other side.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

199 Ill. App. 8, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/joseph-a-kurrus-livery-undertaking-co-v-crossett-illappct-1916.