Joseph A. Kurrus Livery & Undertaking Co. v. Crossett

Appellate Court of Illinois

Joseph A. Kurrus Livery & Undertaking Co. v. Crossett

199 Ill. App. 8

Appellate Court of Illinois·Decided April 17, 1916·Published

Opinion

Mr. Presiding Justice Higbee

delivered the opinion of the court.

4. Appeal and error, § 1778*-—when verdict not reversed on ground of insufficiency of evidence. It is not ground of reversal that the jury believed the testimony of one side rather than another, although the number of witnesses who testified for the party against whom the jury found was greater than the number testifying for the other side.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mr. Presiding Justice Higbee

delivered the opinion of the court.

4. Appeal and error, § 1778*-—when verdict not reversed on ground of insufficiency of evidence. It is not ground of reversal that the jury believed the testimony of one side rather than another, although the number of witnesses who testified for the party against whom the jury found was greater than the number testifying for the other side.

Joseph A. Kurrus Livery & Undertaking Co. v. Crossett, 199 Ill. App. 8 (Ill. Ct. App. 1916).

Pincite

199 Ill. App. 8 (Joseph A. Kurrus Livery & Undertaking Co. v. Crossett) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.