Joseph A. Demma v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)

CourtIndiana Court of Appeals
DecidedDecember 10, 2018
Docket18A-CR-1804
StatusPublished

This text of Joseph A. Demma v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.) (Joseph A. Demma v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Joseph A. Demma v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.), (Ind. Ct. App. 2018).

Opinion

MEMORANDUM DECISION Pursuant to Ind. Appellate Rule 65(D), FILED this Memorandum Decision shall not be Dec 10 2018, 10:32 am regarded as precedent or cited before any court except for the purpose of establishing CLERK Indiana Supreme Court the defense of res judicata, collateral Court of Appeals and Tax Court

estoppel, or the law of the case.

ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANT ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLEE Cara Schaefer Wieneke Curtis T. Hill, Jr. Wieneke Law Office, LLC Attorney General of Indiana Brooklyn, Indiana Monika Prekopa Talbot Supervising Deputy Attorney General Indianapolis, Indiana

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF INDIANA

Joseph A. Demma, December 10, 2018 Appellant-Defendant, Court of Appeals Case No. 18A-CR-1804 v. Appeal from the Vigo Superior Court State of Indiana, The Honorable Appellee-Plaintiff. John T. Roach, Judge Trial Court Cause No. 84D01-1304-FC-1279

Kirsch, Judge.

[1] Joseph A. Demma (“Demma”) appeals the trial court’s order revoking his

direct placement in home detention. He raises the following issue for our

Court of Appeals of Indiana | Memorandum Decision 18A-CR-1804 | December 10, 2018 Page 1 of 5 review: whether his case should be remanded to the trial court because the trial

court failed to give Demma credit time for time he served while incarcerated

when his case was pending.

[2] We remand.

Facts and Procedural History [3] On October 18, 2013, Demma pleaded guilty to two counts of forgery, both as

Class C felonies. Pursuant to the plea agreement, Demma’s sentence was

capped at six years. Appellant’s App. Vol. 2 at 41. On January 27, 2014, the trial

court sentenced Demma to six years for each count with the sentences to run

concurrently. Id. at 78. The trial court further ordered that four years of his

sentence be served as a direct commitment to home detention and the

remaining two years be suspended to probation. Id. at 78-82. Demma filed a

motion to modify his sentence, and on July 20, 2016, the trial court granted the

motion and suspended the balance of Demma’s executed time to probation. Id.

at 87. The trial court noted that Demma’s term of probation at that time was

two years, six months, and twenty-three days. Id. at 88.

[4] On March 12, 2018, Demma was arrested after the State filed a petition alleging

that he violated the terms of his probation. Id. at 10. Demma remained

incarcerated from March 12, 2018 through April 18, 2018. Each time he

appeared in court, on March 12, March 13, April 10, and April 18, 2018,

Demma appeared “in custody of the Vigo County Jail.” Id. at 106-07, 111, 113.

On April 18, 2018, Demma admitted that he violated the terms of his

Court of Appeals of Indiana | Memorandum Decision 18A-CR-1804 | December 10, 2018 Page 2 of 5 probation, and the parties agreed that the balance of Demma’s probation,

which was two years, six months, and twenty-two days, would be revoked and

that Demma would serve that time as a direct commitment to home detention.

Id. at 113. Neither the revocation order nor the abstract of judgment reflected

that Demma was entitled to credit for the time he spent in jail. Id. at 113-16.

[5] Thereafter, Demma violated the terms of his home detention by testing positive

for methamphetamine and admitted the violation at a hearing held on July 3,

2018. Id. at 117-18; Tr. Vol. 2 at 7. At the hearing, the trial court inquired as to

the amount of credit time to which Demma was entitled, and Demma stated

that he had sixty-three days of incarceration between February 24, 2018 and

April 27, 2018. Tr. Vol. 2 at 8. The trial court stated that it was only interested

in credit accrued since April 18, 2018. Id. The trial court ordered that Demma

serve the balance of his probation period in the Indiana Department of

Correction and awarded him eighty-four days of credit for sixteen days served

on home detention from May 22, 2018 through June 6, 2018, and for twenty-six

days served in jail from June 6, 2018 through July 2, 2018. Id. at 8-9; Appellant’s

App. Vol. 2 at 123. Demma informed the court that he believed he was entitled

to credit time for the time he had spent in the jail in March, April, and May

2018. Tr. Vol. 2 at 26. The trial court disagreed. Id. Demma now appeals.

Discussion and Decision [6] Demma argues, and the State concedes, that he was entitled to credit time for

time spent incarcerated between March 12, 2018 and April 18, 2018 and that he

Court of Appeals of Indiana | Memorandum Decision 18A-CR-1804 | December 10, 2018 Page 3 of 5 was not given this credit time when the trial court revoked his direct placement

to home detention. We agree with the parties.

[7] Our Supreme Court has noted that “there are two types of credit that must be

calculated: ‘(1) the credit toward the sentence a prisoner receives for time

actually served; and (2) the additional credit a prisoner receives for good

behavior and educational attainment.’” Maciaszek v. State, 75 N.E.3d 1089,

1092 (Ind. Ct. App. 2017) (quoting Purcell v. State, 721 N.E.2d 220, 222 (Ind.

1999)), trans. denied. “Because credit time is a matter of statutory right, trial

courts do not have discretion in awarding or denying such credit.” Harding v.

State, 27 N.E.3d 330, 331-32 (Ind. Ct. App. 2015).

[8] Here, in our review of the record, it appears that Demma was incarcerated in

the Vigo County Jail awaiting the disposition of a probation violation from

March 12, 2018 through April 18, 2018. Although the exact dates are not clear

from the record, an arrest warrant was served on Demma on March 12, 2018.

Appellant’s App. Vol. 2 at 10. Thereafter, it appears that he remained in the Vigo

County Jail until at least April 18, 2018 because each time he appeared in court,

it was noted that he appeared “in custody of the Vigo County Jail.” Id. at 106-

07, 111, 113. On April 18, 2018, when Demma admitted his probation

violation, the trial court ordered him to serve the balance of his probation,

which was two-years, six months, and twenty-two days. Id. at 113. However,

Demma was not given credit for any time served incarcerated prior to April 18,

2018. Likewise, when Demma’s direct placement to home detention was

revoked on July 3, 2018, he was given credit for eighty-four days for time served

Court of Appeals of Indiana | Memorandum Decision 18A-CR-1804 | December 10, 2018 Page 4 of 5 on home detention from May 22, 2018 through June 6, 2018 and for time

served in jail from June 6, 2018 through July 2, 2018, but the trial court did not

address credit time for Demma’s prior incarceration. Because the record is not

clear regarding the amount of credit time Demma is entitled to, we remand to

the trial court to make such a determination and award Demma the proper

amount of credit time.

[9] Remanded.

Riley, J., and Robb, J., concur.

Court of Appeals of Indiana | Memorandum Decision 18A-CR-1804 | December 10, 2018 Page 5 of 5

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Purcell v. State
721 N.E.2d 220 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1999)
Christopher Harding v. State of Indiana
27 N.E.3d 330 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 2015)
Jacob Maciaszek v. State of Indiana
75 N.E.3d 1089 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 2017)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Joseph A. Demma v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.), Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/joseph-a-demma-v-state-of-indiana-mem-dec-indctapp-2018.