Joseph A. Chase v. United States of America, Raymond Barnes v. United States of America, Bernice Budd v. United States of America, Daniel W. Cunningham v. United States
This text of 256 F.2d 891 (Joseph A. Chase v. United States of America, Raymond Barnes v. United States of America, Bernice Budd v. United States of America, Daniel W. Cunningham v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Joseph A. CHASE, Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES of America, Appellee.
Raymond BARNES, Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES of America, Appellee.
Bernice BUDD, Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES of America, Appellee.
Daniel W. CUNNINGHAM, Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES of America, Appellee.
Nos. 14325-14328.
United States Court of Appeals District of Columbia Circuit.
Argued June 10, 1958.
Decided June 26, 1958.
Mr. H. Clifford Allder, Washington, D. C., for appellants in Nos. 14325 and 14326.
Mr. Kenneth D. Wood, Washington, D. C., for appellants in Nos. 14327 and 14328.
Mr. John W. Kern, III, Asst. U. S. Atty., with whom Messrs. Oliver Gasch, U. S. Atty., and Carl W. Belcher and Frederick G. Smithson, Asst. U. S. Attys., were on the brief, for appellee.
Before EDGERTON, Chief Judge, and WILBUR K. MILLER and DANAHER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
These appeals are from convictions of conspiring to violate, and violating, the lottery laws of the District of Columbia. We find no error affecting substantial rights.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
256 F.2d 891, 103 U.S. App. D.C. 177, 1958 U.S. App. LEXIS 4428, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/joseph-a-chase-v-united-states-of-america-raymond-barnes-v-united-cadc-1958.