Jose Valle-Alvarez v. William Barr

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedMarch 11, 2020
Docket19-1586
StatusUnpublished

This text of Jose Valle-Alvarez v. William Barr (Jose Valle-Alvarez v. William Barr) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Jose Valle-Alvarez v. William Barr, (4th Cir. 2020).

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 19-1586

JOSE ERNESTO VALLE-ALVAREZ,

Petitioner,

v.

WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals.

Submitted: February 20, 2020 Decided: March 11, 2020

Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and AGEE and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Gina M. Takemori, TAKEMORI LAW, Germantown, Maryland, for Petitioner. Joseph H. Hunt, Assistant Attorney General, Stephen J. Flynn, Assistant Director, Kathryn M. McKinney, Office of Immigration Litigation, Civil Division, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Jose Ernesto Valle-Alvarez, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of

an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (Board) denying his motion to reconsider.

We have reviewed the administrative record and Valle-Alvarez’s claims, and conclude that

the Board did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(a),

(b)(1) (2019); Narine v. Holder, 559 F.3d 246, 249 (4th Cir. 2009); Jean v. Gonzales, 435

F.3d 475, 481, 483 (4th Cir. 2006). Accordingly, we deny the petition for review for the

reasons stated by the Board. See In re Valle-Alvarez (B.I.A. May 15, 2019). We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Narine v. Holder
559 F.3d 246 (Fourth Circuit, 2009)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Jose Valle-Alvarez v. William Barr, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jose-valle-alvarez-v-william-barr-ca4-2020.