Jose Valdes v. Kimberly Valdes

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Jose Valdes v. Kimberly Valdes

192 So. 3d 625, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 7958, 2016 WL 3011786

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMay 25, 2016

Docket4D15-1797

StatusPublished

This text of 192 So. 3d 625 (Jose Valdes v. Kimberly Valdes) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Jose Valdes v. Kimberly Valdes, 192 So. 3d 625, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 7958, 2016 WL 3011786 (Fla. Ct. App. 2016).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The Father appeals the Final Judgment of Dissolution, arguing the trial court abused its discretion by seeking out and inventing its own facts, and that the trial court miscalculated his timesharing. We agree the trial court erred in its calculation of timesharing. The Final Judgment and Parenting Plan awarded the Father 41.87% timesharing. However, the Parenting Plan reflects only 22% of actual timesharing for the Father. Accordingly, we reverse and remand for recalculation. On remand, the trial court should also clarify when the Father’s weekend time-sharing begins.

Reversed and remanded.

STEVENSON, DAMOORGIAN and LEVINE, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The Father appeals the Final Judgment of Dissolution, arguing the trial court abused its discretion by seeking out and inventing its own facts, and that the trial court miscalculated his timesharing. We agree the trial court erred in its calculation of timesharing. The Final Judgment and Parenting Plan awarded the Father 41.87% timesharing. However, the Parenting Plan reflects only 22% of actual timesharing for the Father. Accordingly, we reverse and remand for recalculation. On remand, the trial court should also clarify when the Father’s weekend time-sharing begins.

Reversed and remanded.

STEVENSON, DAMOORGIAN and LEVINE, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

192 So. 3d 625, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 7958, 2016 WL 3011786, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jose-valdes-v-kimberly-valdes-fladistctapp-2016.