Jose Trujillo v. Mariscos Costa Azul Incorporated
Opinion
□□□ 4.4970 VV VUOUL WAAW MVVULTIOCEI Oo □□□ Viletneav Paye +vrst
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA JOSE TRUJILLO, Case No. 1:19-cv-00891-SAB Plaintiff, ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO CLOSE CASE AND ADJUST THE v. DOCKET TO REFLECT VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL PURSUANT TO RULE 41 (a) MARISCOS COSTA AZUL OF THE FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL INCORPORATED, et al., PROCEDURE Defendants. (ECF No. 33) On July 23, 2020, a stipulation was filed dismissing this action without prejudice and with each party to bear its own costs and fees. In light of the stipulation of the parties, this action has been terminated, Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)Gi); Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997), and has been dismissed without prejudice and without an award of costs or attorneys’ fees. Accordingly, the Clerk of the Court is HEREBY ORDERED to CLOSE the file in this case and adjust the docket to reflect voluntary dismissal of this action pursuant to Rule □□ (a). IT IS SO ORDERED. FA. 54 Dated: _July 24, 2020 2 ee = UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Jose Trujillo v. Mariscos Costa Azul Incorporated (Jose Trujillo v. Mariscos Costa Azul Incorporated) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.