Jose Silva v. State
This text of Jose Silva v. State (Jose Silva v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
PER CURIAM
In May 2002, appellant's court-appointed attorney filed a brief concluding that the appeal is frivolous and without merit. See Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967); see also Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75 (1988); High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807 (Tex. Crim. App. 1978); Currie v. State, 516 S.W.2d 684 (Tex. Crim. App. 1974); Jackson v. State, 485 S.W.2d 553 (Tex. Crim. App. 1972); Gainous v. State, 436 S.W.2d 137 (Tex. Crim. App. 1969). In June, appellant asked to examine the appellate record for the purpose of filing a pro se brief, as is his right under Anders. The district clerk has yet to comply with this request.
The Travis County District Clerk, Ms. Amalia Rodriguez-Mendoza, is ordered to immediately forward a copy of the clerk's record and reporter's record in this cause to appellant (TDC no. 1102684) at the Byrd Unit, P.O. Box 100, Huntsville, Texas 77343. The district clerk shall notify this Court in writing of her compliance with this order. The time for filing appellant's pro se brief is extended to October 11, 2002.
It is ordered August 23, 2002.
Before Justices Kidd, Patterson and Puryear
Do Not Publish
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Jose Silva v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jose-silva-v-state-texapp-2002.