Jose Santos Garcia v. State

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedFebruary 14, 2020
Docket04-20-00082-CR
StatusPublished

This text of Jose Santos Garcia v. State (Jose Santos Garcia v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Jose Santos Garcia v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2020).

Opinion

Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas February 14, 2020

No. 04-20-00082-CR

Jose Santos GARCIA, Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas, Appellee

From the 226th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2014CR3069 The Honorable Velia J. Meza, Judge Presiding

ORDER Appellant filed a notice of appeal which indicates he is appealing a conviction in Cause No. 2014CR3069. The clerk’s record in this appeal contains an Order Modifying and Extending Community Supervision signed on January 14, 2020. This court does not have jurisdiction to consider an appeal from an order altering or modifying community supervision conditions. Davis v. State, 195 S.W.3d 708, 710 (Tex. Crim. App. 2006) (“There is no legislative authority for entertaining a direct appeal from an order modifying the conditions of community supervision.”); Basaldua v. State, 558 S.W.2d 2, 5 (Tex. Crim. App. 1977); Quaglia v. State, 906 S.W.2d 112, 113 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 1995, no pet.).

To the extent appellant wishes to appeal the original conviction, the trial court imposed sentence in Cause No. 2014CR3069 on April 6, 2015. The trial court assessed punishment at ten years’ imprisonment, which was suspended in favor of community supervision for a term of five years. Because appellant did not file a motion for new trial, the notice of appeal was due to be filed on May 6, 2015. Tex. R. App. P. 26.2(a)(1). A motion for extension of time to file the notice of appeal was due on May 21, 2015. Tex. R. App. P. 26.3. On January 16, 2020, appellant filed a Motion for Leave to File a Late Notice of Appeal. Because the notice of appeal in this case was not timely filed, we lack jurisdiction to entertain this appeal. See Slaton v. State, 981 S.W.2d 208, 210 (Tex. Crim. App. 1998) (holding that if an appeal is not timely perfected, the court of appeals does not obtain jurisdiction to address the merits of appeal, and the court may take no action other than to dismiss appeal; an appellate court may not suspend rules to alter time for perfecting appeal). It is therefore ORDERED that appellant show cause on or before March 16, 2020 why this appeal should not be dismissed for want of jurisdiction.

_________________________________ Irene Rios, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 14th day of February, 2020.

___________________________________ Michael A. Cruz, Clerk of Court

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Davis v. State
195 S.W.3d 708 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 2006)
Basaldua v. State
558 S.W.2d 2 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1977)
Quaglia v. State
906 S.W.2d 112 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1995)
Slaton v. State
981 S.W.2d 208 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1998)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Jose Santos Garcia v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jose-santos-garcia-v-state-texapp-2020.