Jose Salazar-Rodriguez v. Jefferson Sessions

708 F. App'x 363
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedDecember 22, 2017
Docket14-71740
StatusUnpublished

This text of 708 F. App'x 363 (Jose Salazar-Rodriguez v. Jefferson Sessions) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Jose Salazar-Rodriguez v. Jefferson Sessions, 708 F. App'x 363 (9th Cir. 2017).

Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Jose Salazar Rodriguez, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s decision finding him removable. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for substantial evidence the agency’s factual findings, Valadez-Munoz v. Holder, 623 F.3d 1304, 1308 (9th Cir. 2010). We deny the petition for review.

Substantial evidence supports the agency’s determination that Salazar Rodriguez is inadmissible under 8 U.S.C. § 1182(a)(6)(C)(ii) because he made a false claim of United States citizenship to gain entry to the United States. See Valadez-Munoz, 623 F.3d at 1308-09 (record did not compel reversal of agency’s determination that petitioner made a false claim of citizenship where he presented border officials with a Texas birth certificate and a California driver license under a different identity in his attempt to enter the United States). Thus, we deny the petition for review.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

**

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Valadez-Munoz v. Holder
623 F.3d 1304 (Ninth Circuit, 2010)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
708 F. App'x 363, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jose-salazar-rodriguez-v-jefferson-sessions-ca9-2017.