Jose Rosales and Sabrina Rosales v. Jeffrey Gallagher and Susan Gallagher
This text of Jose Rosales and Sabrina Rosales v. Jeffrey Gallagher and Susan Gallagher (Jose Rosales and Sabrina Rosales v. Jeffrey Gallagher and Susan Gallagher) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
DISMISS; Opinion Filed November 13, 2012.
in The (!nairt uf Apprat FiftIi Oitrtrt nf Lrxa at Ja1ta No. 05-12-OI059 7 -C
JOSE ROSALES AND SABRINA ROSALES, Appellants
V.
JEFFREY GALLAGhER AND SUSAN GALLAGHER, Appellees
On Appeal from the 380th Judicial District Court Collin County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 380-02266-2011
MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Moseley, Fillmore, and Myers Opinion By Justice Moseley
Our jurisdiction is fundamental and, subject to a few mostly statutory exceptions, invoked
only upon the timely filing of a notice of appeal from a final judgment. TEX. R. App. . 25.1(b),
26.1; Lehmann i’. Har-Con Corp., 39 S.W.3d 191, 195 (Tex. 2001); K& Sinterests, Inc. v. Tex. Am.
Bank/Dallas, 749 S.W.2d 887, 890 (Tex .App.—--Dallas 1988, writ denied). The judgment Jose and
Sabrina Rosales challenge in this appeal was signed April 27, 2012. The Rosaleses timely filed a
motion for new trial, making their notice of appeal due July 26, 2012. or with an extension motion,
August 10, 2012. See TEX. R. App. P.26.1(a), 26.3. The notice of appeal was filed July 31, 2012,
hut without an extension motion.
Because a motion for extension of time is necessarily implied when an appellant acting in good faith flies a notice ofappeal within fifteen days ofthe date it is due. we directed the Rosaleses,
by letter dated October 12. 2012. to file an extension motion that complied with rule of appellate
procedure 10.5(b). See T€x. R. APP. P. i 0.5(b), 26.3(b); Verburgt v. Dorner, 959 S.W.2d 615,617
(1997). We directed the Rosaleses to file the motion by October 22.2012 and cautioned them that
the appeal would be dismissed without further notice if they filled to comply. See Id. 42.3(a). To
date, the Rosaleses have not filed an extension motion or otherwise communicated with the Court.
Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal. See Id.
121059F.P05
—2— !nitrt of 41pra1 FiftI! 1iitrirt of ixai at 1a11ai
JUDGMENT JOSE ROSALES AND SAI3RINA Appeal from the 30th Judicial District Court ROSALES, Appellants of Collin County. Texas. (Tr.Ct.No. 380- 02266-2011). No. 05-1 2-01 059-CV Opinion delivered by Justice Moseley. Justices Fillmore and Myers participating. ILFFRI (i&LLAGHER AND SuSAN GALLAGHER, Appellees
In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, we DISMiSS the appeal. We ORDER that appellees Jeffrey Gallagher and Susan Gallagher recover their costs, if any. of this appeal from appellants Jose Rosales and Sabrina Rosales.
Judgment cntcrLd Novcmhei 1 3 2012 / / / / II I / i/•!j/i 1/ / / J /L’ JIM MOSELtY JUSTICE
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Jose Rosales and Sabrina Rosales v. Jeffrey Gallagher and Susan Gallagher, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jose-rosales-and-sabrina-rosales-v-jeffrey-gallagh-texapp-2012.