Jose Ramos v. State

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedAugust 4, 2011
Docket13-10-00022-CR
StatusPublished

This text of Jose Ramos v. State (Jose Ramos v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Jose Ramos v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2011).

Opinion

                                       NUMBER 13-10-00022-CR

                                 COURT OF APPEALS

                     THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

                         CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

____________________________________________________________

JOSE RAMOS,                                                                               Appellant,

                                                             v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,                                                                 Appellee.

                            On appeal from the 94th District Court

of Nueces County, Texas.

                                      MEMORANDUM OPINION

     Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Rodriguez and Garza

                               Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

Appellant, Jose Ramos, was convicted of assault.  On January 13, 2010, appellant filed a notice of appeal by and through his attorney.  Counsel for appellant subsequently informed this Court that appellant did not intend to prosecute his appeal.  Counsel filed a motion to dismiss the appeal, but the motion was denied because it did not contain appellant’s signature.  See Tex. R. App. P. 42.2 (a).   

On April 29, 2011, this Court abated the appeal because of counsel=s failure to file a brief and ordered the trial court to determine whether appellant desired to prosecute this appeal.  Following the trial court hearing, the trial court issued an order that the appeal be dismissed.  

Although no written motion has been filed in compliance with Rule 42.2(a) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure, based upon the order issued by the trial court we conclude that appellant does not want to continue his appeal and that good cause exists to suspend the operation of Rule 42.2(a) in this case.  See Tex. R. App. P. 2.   Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal.

PER CURIAM

Do not publish.  See Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b). 

Delivered and filed the

4th day of August, 2011.


Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Jose Ramos v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jose-ramos-v-state-texapp-2011.