Jose Ramos-Gomez v. Loretta E. Lynch
This text of 669 F. App'x 367 (Jose Ramos-Gomez v. Loretta E. Lynch) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM **
Jose Carlos Ramos-Gomez, a native and citizen of Mexico,' petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s removal order. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review de novo questions of law, Coronado v. Holder, 759 F.3d 977, 982 (9th Cir. 2014), and we deny the petition for review.
The BIA correctly concluded that Ramos-Gomez is removable because his conviction under California Penal Code § 273.5 is a categorical crime of domestic violence under 8 U.S.C. § 1227(a)(2)(E)(i). See Carrillo v. Holder, 781 F.3d 1155, 1159 (9th Cir. 2015) (“[California Penal Code] § 273.5 is categorically a crime of domestic violence within the meaning of [8 U.S.C.] § 1227(a)(2)(E)®.”).
In light of our disposition, we do not reach Ramos-Gomez’s contention that his conviction 4s not an aggravated felony crime of violence.
PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3,
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
669 F. App'x 367, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jose-ramos-gomez-v-loretta-e-lynch-ca9-2016.