Jose Ramos-Gomez v. Loretta E. Lynch

669 F. App'x 367
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedSeptember 21, 2016
Docket14-71337
StatusUnpublished

This text of 669 F. App'x 367 (Jose Ramos-Gomez v. Loretta E. Lynch) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Jose Ramos-Gomez v. Loretta E. Lynch, 669 F. App'x 367 (9th Cir. 2016).

Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Jose Carlos Ramos-Gomez, a native and citizen of Mexico,' petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s removal order. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review de novo questions of law, Coronado v. Holder, 759 F.3d 977, 982 (9th Cir. 2014), and we deny the petition for review.

The BIA correctly concluded that Ramos-Gomez is removable because his conviction under California Penal Code § 273.5 is a categorical crime of domestic violence under 8 U.S.C. § 1227(a)(2)(E)(i). See Carrillo v. Holder, 781 F.3d 1155, 1159 (9th Cir. 2015) (“[California Penal Code] § 273.5 is categorically a crime of domestic violence within the meaning of [8 U.S.C.] § 1227(a)(2)(E)®.”).

In light of our disposition, we do not reach Ramos-Gomez’s contention that his conviction 4s not an aggravated felony crime of violence.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

**

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3,

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Jose Marquez Carrillo v. Eric Holder, Jr.
781 F.3d 1155 (Ninth Circuit, 2015)
Coronado v. Holder
759 F.3d 977 (Ninth Circuit, 2014)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
669 F. App'x 367, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jose-ramos-gomez-v-loretta-e-lynch-ca9-2016.