Jose Pena v. Experian Information Solutions, Inc.

CourtDistrict Court, C.D. California
DecidedJanuary 17, 2025
Docket8:22-cv-01115
StatusUnknown

This text of Jose Pena v. Experian Information Solutions, Inc. (Jose Pena v. Experian Information Solutions, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, C.D. California primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Jose Pena v. Experian Information Solutions, Inc., (C.D. Cal. 2025).

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA CIVIL MINUTES— GENERAL

Case No. 8:22-cv-01115-SSS-ADSx Date January 17, 2025 Title Jose Pena v. Experian Information Solutions, Inc,. et al.

Present: The Honorable SUNSHINE S. SYKES, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Irene Vazquez Not Reported Deputy Clerk Court Reporter

Attorney(s) Present for Plaintiff(s): Attorney(s) Present for Defendant(s): None Present None Present

Proceedings: (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: DISMISSAL OF CLASS ALLEGATIONS On November 13, 2024, this Court denied Plaintiff Maria Pena’s Motion for Class Certification because she is an atypical class representative. [Dkt. 154]. The Court ordered her to show cause as to why the class allegations should not be dismissed. [Dkt.155]. Plaintiff requested she have until December 16, 2024 to file a Motion to Intervene to add a different class member as class representative, and the Court granted her request. [Dkts. 159, 160]. Plaintiff timely filed a Motion to Intervene Juan Lopez Morales (“Morales”) as lead plaintiff and class representative. [Dkt. 161]. However, on January 15, 2025, Proposed Plaintiff Morales filed a Notice of Withdrawal of Motion to Intervene. [Dkt. 163]. The Court provided Plaintiff with “adequate time to present a substitute class representative.” [Dkt. 159, Plaintiff’s Response, citing Benedict v. Hewlett- Packard Co., 314 F.R.D. 457, 471 (N.D. Cal. 2016)]. Accordingly, the Court ORDERS Plaintiff to show cause as to why the class allegations should not be dismissed by noon on Friday January 24, 2025. Failure to do so may result in dismissal of this action. IT IS SO ORDERED. Page 1 of 1 CIVIL MINUTES—GENERAL Initials of Deputy Clerk iv

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Benedict v. Hewlett-Packard Co.
314 F.R.D. 457 (N.D. California, 2016)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Jose Pena v. Experian Information Solutions, Inc., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jose-pena-v-experian-information-solutions-inc-cacd-2025.