Jose Pazarin-Castrejon v. Eric Holder, Jr.
This text of 435 F. App'x 709 (Jose Pazarin-Castrejon v. Eric Holder, Jr.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM **
Jose Luis Pazarin-Castrejon, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order summarily affirming an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) removal order. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review de novo questions of law, Cazarez-Gutierrez v. Ashcroft, 382 F.3d 905, 909 (9th Cir.2004), and we deny the petition for review.
The IJ properly concluded that Pazarin-Castrejon’s conviction for violating California Health and Safety Code § 11378 is an aggravated felony under 8 U.S.C. § 1101(a)(43)(B). See Rendon v. Mukasey, 520 F.3d 967, 976 (9th Cir.2008) (“[P]ossession of a controlled substance with the intent to sell contains a trafficking element and is an aggravated felony.”); see also United States v. Valle-Montalbo, 474 F.3d 1197, 1201 (9th Cir.2007) (section 11378 criminalizes only possession of a controlled substance with the intent to sell).
PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
435 F. App'x 709, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jose-pazarin-castrejon-v-eric-holder-jr-ca9-2011.