Jose Mateo v. State of Florida
This text of Jose Mateo v. State of Florida (Jose Mateo v. State of Florida) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida
Opinion filed April 8, 2026. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
________________
No. 3D26-0270 Lower Tribunal No. F14-17002 A ________________
Jose Mateo, Appellant,
vs.
State of Florida, Appellee.
An Appeal under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Cristina Miranda, Judge.
Jose Mateo, in proper person.
James Uthmeier, Attorney General, and Yolande M. Samerson, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.
Before FERNANDEZ, GORDO AND BOKOR, JJ.
PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See Wainwright v. State, 411 So. 3d 392, 399 (Fla. 2025),
cert. denied sub nom. Wainwright v. Florida, 145 S. Ct. 2789 (2025) (“We
reject Wainwright's argument because even if Erlinger constitutes a change
of law, it does not apply retroactively.”); Pace v. State, 415 So. 3d 750, 751
(Fla. 3d DCA 2025) (same); Perez v. State, 421 So. 3d 759, 760 (Fla. 3d
DCA 2025) (same).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Jose Mateo v. State of Florida, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jose-mateo-v-state-of-florida-fladistctapp-2026.