Jose Manuel Silva Quintanilla v. US Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), Warden
This text of 551 F. App'x 497 (Jose Manuel Silva Quintanilla v. US Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), Warden) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Jose Quintanilla, a federal prisoner confined at United States Penitentiary (USP) Atlanta, appeals from the dismissal for *498 lack of jurisdiction of his pro se habeas corpus petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2241. In his petition, Quintanilla asked the district court to order respondent Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) to remove an immigration detainer lodged against him.
The district court adopted the report and recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissed the petition for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. See Orozco v. INS, 911 F.2d 539, 541 (11th Cir.1990) (dismissing Section 2241 petition filed by state prisoner against whom only an immigration detainer was lodged). The filing of an immigration detainer, alone, does not render a federal prisoner in custody of ICE under Section 2241 for purposes of challenging that detainer. Id.
Having reviewed the record and considered the arguments of the parties contained in their briefs, we affirm the district court in all respects to this appeal for the reasons stated by the district court.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
551 F. App'x 497, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jose-manuel-silva-quintanilla-v-us-immigration-and-customs-enforcement-ca11-2013.