Jose MacIas-larios v. Loretta E. Lynch

639 F. App'x 492
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedMay 6, 2016
Docket12-71967
StatusUnpublished

This text of 639 F. App'x 492 (Jose MacIas-larios v. Loretta E. Lynch) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Jose MacIas-larios v. Loretta E. Lynch, 639 F. App'x 492 (9th Cir. 2016).

Opinion

ORDER ***

This case is REMANDED for the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) to “consider, in the first instance, the potential application of the modified categorical approach, as well as the merits of Petitioner’s request for cancellation” of removal. Madrigal-Barcenas v. Lynch, 797 F.3d 643, 645 (9th Cir.2015). Petitioner’s removal is stayed pending a decision in this matter by the BIA.

The parties shall bear their own attorney fees, costs, and expenses on appeal. This order shall serve as the mandate of this court.

***

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Pedro Madrigal-Barcenas v. Eric Holder, Jr.
797 F.3d 643 (Ninth Circuit, 2015)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
639 F. App'x 492, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jose-macias-larios-v-loretta-e-lynch-ca9-2016.