Jose MacIas-larios v. Loretta E. Lynch

639 F. App'x 492
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided May 6, 2016·No. 12-71967·Unpublished

Opinion

ORDER ***

This case is REMANDED for the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) to “consider, in the first instance, the potential application of the modified categorical approach, as well as the merits of Petitioner’s request for cancellation” of removal. Madrigal-Barcenas v. Lynch, 797 F.3d 643, 645 (9th Cir.2015). Petitioner’s removal is stayed pending a decision in this matter by the BIA.

The parties shall bear their own attorney fees, costs, and expenses on appeal. This order shall serve as the mandate of this court.

***

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Jose MacIas-larios v. Loretta E. Lynch, 639 F. App'x 492 (9th Cir. 2016).

639 F. App'x 492 (Jose MacIas-larios v. Loretta E. Lynch) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Pedro Madrigal-Barcenas v. Eric Holder, Jr.
797 F.3d 643 (Ninth Circuit, 2015)