Jose Luis Segura v. Hajoca Corporation

CourtDistrict Court, N.D. California
DecidedFebruary 5, 2026
Docket3:25-cv-10311
StatusUnknown

This text of Jose Luis Segura v. Hajoca Corporation (Jose Luis Segura v. Hajoca Corporation) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, N.D. California primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Jose Luis Segura v. Hajoca Corporation, (N.D. Cal. 2026).

Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 JOSE LUIS SEGURA, Case No. 3:25-cv-10311-JSC

8 Plaintiff, ORDER SETTING BENCH TRIAL ON 9 v. CONTRACT FORMATION

10 HAJOCA CORPORATION, Re: Dkt. Nos. 5, 18, 19 Defendant. 11

12 13 Jose Segura brings this putative class action alleging his employer, Hajoca Corporation, 14 violated California wage and hour laws. Plaintiff initially filed the action in the Alameda County 15 Superior Court and Hajoca removed under the Class Action Fairness Act (CAFA), 28 U.S.C. § 16 1332(d)(2). (Dkt. No. 1.) Shortly after removal, Hajoca filed a motion to compel arbitration based 17 on an arbitration agreement within Hajoca’s onboarding documents. (Dkt. No. 5.) Because the 18 parties’ briefing indicated there might be a dispute as to contract formation, the Court ordered the 19 parties to meet and confer and file a joint statement addressing the dispute and whether, if a 20 dispute remained, the parties sought any discovery prior to a trial to resolve the contract formation 21 dispute. (Dkt. No. 18.) The parties have filed a joint statement indicating the dispute remains, 22 declining any discovery, and requesting a “trial of the issue as determined by the Court.” (Dkt. 23 No. 19 at 2.) In light of the parties’ submission, the Court sets a bench trial as set forth below1. 24 I. TRIAL DATE 25 A. A bench trial shall begin on April 28, 2026, at 8:30 a.m., in Courtroom 8, 19th 26 Floor, U.S. District Court, 450 Golden Gate Avenue, San Francisco, California. 27 1 B. The length of the trial will not exceed 1 day. 2 C. As the party seeking to compel arbitration, Hajoca will bear the burden of proving 3 the existence of an agreement to arbitrate. Johnson v. Walmart Inc., 57 F.4th 677, 681 (9th Cir. 4 2023). 5 II. TRIAL PROCEDURES A. Counsel shall not prepare a Joint Pretrial Conference Statement. Instead, twenty 6 (20) calendar days in advance of trial, please do the following: 7 The parties shall meet and confer in person or via video-conference to prepare 8 and file a jointly signed, Proposed Final Pretrial Order that contains: 9 (a) a brief description of the substance of the issues to be decided; 10 (b) all stipulated facts; 11 (c) a list of all factual issues to be tried; 12 (d) a joint exhibit list in numerical order, including a brief description of the 13 exhibit and Bates numbers, a blank column for when it will be offered into 14 evidence, a blank column for when it may be received into evidence, and a 15 blank column for any limitations on its use; and 16 (e) each party’s separate witness list for its case-in-chief witness providing, for 17 all such witnesses other than an individual plaintiff and an individual defendant, 18 a short statement of the substance of his/her testimony and, separately, what, if 19 any, non-cumulative testimony the witness will offer. If non-cumulative 20 testimony is not spelled out, the Court will presume the witness is cumulative. 21 For each witness, state an hour/minute time estimate for the direct examination 22 (only). 23 Items (d) and (e) should be appendices to the proposed order. 24 B. Not less than seven (7) days before trial, counsel and/or the parties shall file and 25 serve any objections to exhibits. Exhibits and witnesses not included in the proposed Joint Pretrial 26 Order above may not be used in a party’s case-in-chief and may not be used during cross 27 examination of the other side’s case- in-chief (other than for impeachment). Defense witnesses 1 are considered case-in-chief witnesses, not “rebuttal” witnesses. Objections to exhibits not raised 2 are waived. 3 C. Not less than seven (7) days before trial, each side shall also file proposed Findings 4 of Fact and Conclusions of Law. D. Two (2) Chambers’ copies of all of the aforementioned documents shall be hand- 5 delivered to the Clerk’s Office at the time of filing. All hard-copy submissions should be three- 6 hole punched. 7 PRETRIAL ARRANGEMENTS 8 A. Should a daily transcript and/or real-time reporting be desired, the parties shall 9 make arrangements with the Court Reporting Services Supervisor at (415) 522-2079, at least ten 10 (10) calendar days prior to the trial date. 11 B. During trial, counsel may wish to use overhead projectors, laser-disk/computer 12 graphics, poster blow-ups, models, or specimens of devices. Equipment should be shared by all 13 counsel to the maximum extent possible. The Court provides no equipment other than an easel. 14 The United States Marshal requires a court order to allow equipment into the courthouse. For 15 electronic equipment, parties should be prepared to maintain the equipment or have a technician 16 handy at all times. The parties shall tape extension cords to the carpet for safety. The parties may 17 work with the deputy clerk, Ada Means (415-522-2015), on all courtroom-layout issues. 18 OPENING STATEMENTS 19 Each side will be permitted 10 minutes for opening statements. 20 WITNESSES 21 The parties shall have all witnesses available in the courthouse and ready to testify on 22 April 28, 2026. Failure to have the next witness ready or to be prepared to proceed with the 23 evidence will usually be deemed to constitute resting. 24 EXHIBITS 25 A. Prior to the first day of trial, counsel must meet and confer in person to consider all 26 exhibit numbers and objections and to eliminate duplicate exhibits and confusion over the precise 27 exhibit. 1 B. Use numbers only, not letters, for exhibits, preferably the same numbers as were 2 used in depositions. Blocks of numbers should be assigned to fit the need of the case (e.g., 3 Plaintiff has 1 to 100, Defendant A has 101 to 200, Defendant B has 201 to 300, etc.). A single 4 exhibit should be marked only once, just as it should have been marked only once in discovery pursuant to this Court’s discovery guidelines). If the plaintiff has marked an exhibit, then the 5 defendant should not re-mark the exact document with another number. Different versions of the 6 same document, e.g., a copy with additional handwriting, must be treated as different exhibits with 7 different numbers. To avoid any party claiming “ownership” of an exhibit, all exhibits shall be 8 marked and referred to as “Trial Exhibit No. _____,” not as “Plaintiff’s Exhibit” or “Defendant’s 9 Exhibit.” If an exhibit number differs from that used in a deposition transcript, then the latter 10 transcript must be conformed to the new trial number, if and when the deposition testimony is 11 used (so as to avoid confusion over exhibit numbers). There should be no competing versions of 12 the same exhibit number; any discrepancies must be brought to the Court’s attention promptly. 13 The exhibit tag shall be in the following form: 14

15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 16 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 17

18 TRIAL EXHIBIT 100 19

20 Case No. ________________ 21

22 Date Entered _____________ 23

24 By______________________ Deputy Clerk 25 26

27 1 Place the tag on or near the lower right-hand corner or, if a photograph, on the back. Counsel 2 || should fill in the tag but leave the last two spaces blank. The parties must jointly prepare a single 3 || set ofall trial exhibits that will be the official record set to be used with the witnesses and on 4 || appeal. Each exhibit must be tagged, three-hole-punched, separated with a label divider 5 identifying the exhibit number, and placed in 3-ring binders. Spine labels should indicate the 6 numbers of the exhibits that are in the binders. Each set of exhibit binders should be marked as 7 “Original”. Deposit the exhibits with the deputy clerk seven (7) days before trial. g C.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Kevin Johnson v. Walmart Inc.
57 F.4th 677 (Ninth Circuit, 2023)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Jose Luis Segura v. Hajoca Corporation, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jose-luis-segura-v-hajoca-corporation-cand-2026.