Jose Luis Regalado v. the State of Texas

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedAugust 18, 2022
Docket03-22-00251-CR
StatusPublished

This text of Jose Luis Regalado v. the State of Texas (Jose Luis Regalado v. the State of Texas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Jose Luis Regalado v. the State of Texas, (Tex. Ct. App. 2022).

Opinion

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-22-00251-CR

Jose Luis Regalado, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

FROM THE 207TH DISTRICT COURT OF COMAL COUNTY NO. CR2020-874, THE HONORABLE R. BRUCE BOYER, JUDGE PRESIDING

ORDER AND MEMORANDUM OPINION

PER CURIAM

Jose Luis Regalado was charged with two counts of the second-degree felony

offense of indecency with a child by contact. See Tex. Penal Code § 21.11(d). During trial,

Regalado pleaded not guilty to both charges. At the conclusion of the trial, the jury found

Regalado guilty on both counts as charged. After his convictions, the district court issued its

certification of Regalado’s right of appeal with check marks next to the boxes certifying that this

case “is a plea-bargain case, and the defendant has NO right of appeal” and that “the defendant

has waived the right of appeal.”

When determining whether an appellant in a criminal case has the right to appeal,

we examine the trial court’s certification for defectiveness, defined as “a certification which is

correct in form but which, when compared to the record before the court, proves to be

inaccurate.” Dears v. State, 154 S.W.3d 610, 614 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005). If the certification appears to be defective, we must obtain a correct certification. Id. at 614-15. Based on the

record before this Court, the district court’s certification signed on April 25, 2022, appears to be

incorrect. See id. at 614.

Accordingly, we abate the appeal and remand the case to the district court to issue

a new certification. See Tex. R. App. P. 37.1 (requiring appellate court to notify parties if there

appears to be defect in certification); Dears, 154 S.W.3d at 614 (stating that appellate courts

have authority under Rules of Appellate Procedure “to obtain another certification, whenever

appropriate”). The district court clerk is instructed to forward to this Court a supplemental

clerk’s record containing the new certification no later than September 19, 2022. See Tex. R.

App. P. 34.5(c)(2).

It is ordered on August 18, 2022.

Before Chief Justice Byrne, Justices Triana and Smith

Abated and Remanded

Filed: August 18, 2022

Do Not Publish

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Dears v. State
154 S.W.3d 610 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 2005)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Jose Luis Regalado v. the State of Texas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jose-luis-regalado-v-the-state-of-texas-texapp-2022.