Jose Luis Gonzalez v. Eliamar Chapa

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedJanuary 26, 2006
Docket13-05-00691-CV
StatusPublished

This text of Jose Luis Gonzalez v. Eliamar Chapa (Jose Luis Gonzalez v. Eliamar Chapa) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Jose Luis Gonzalez v. Eliamar Chapa, (Tex. Ct. App. 2006).

Opinion

                             NUMBER 13-05-691-CV

                         COURT OF APPEALS

               THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

                  CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

___________________________________________________________________

JOSE LUIS GONZALEZ,                                             Appellant,

                                           v.

ELIAMAR CHAPA,                                                     Appellee.

___________________________________________________________________

             On appeal from the County Court at Law No. 2

                           of Hidalgo County, Texas.

___________________________________________________________________

                     MEMORANDUM OPINION

       Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Yañez and Garza

                             Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam


Appellant, JOSE LUIS GONZALEZ, perfected an appeal from a judgment entered by the County Court at Law No. 2 of Hidalgo County, Texas, in cause number CL-05-0228-B.   After the clerk=s record was filed, the parties filed a joint motion for partial remand.  In the motion, the parties state that they have reached an agreement regarding this appeal.  The parties have agreed that the judgment to the issue of the damages sustained by the plaintiff should be reversed and remanded to the trial court for further consideration.  The parties request that this Court affirm the judgment as to liability and reverse the judgment on damages and remand that portion of the case for a trial.

The Court, having examined and fully considered the documents on file and  the parties= joint motion, is of the opinion that the motion should be granted.  The joint motion is GRANTED.  The judgment of the trial court as to liability is AFFIRMED.  The judgment on damages is REVERSED and the cause is REMANDED to the trial court in accordance with the parties= agreement.

PER CURIAM

Memorandum Opinion delivered and filed

this the 26th day of January, 2006.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Jose Luis Gonzalez v. Eliamar Chapa, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jose-luis-gonzalez-v-eliamar-chapa-texapp-2006.